Story taken direct from Pulse Today:
'Patients over 75 will be guaranteed a same-day appointment with a GP
if the Conservative Party wins the general election, it was announced
over the weekend.
In an interview with the Telegraph on Saturday, health secretary Jeremy Hunt said the party will enable same-day access by introducing 5,000 new GPs by 2020.
A follow-up article published on the Conservative Party’s website over the weekend
by chancellor George Osborne said this would be made possible via a
commitment to a minimum real-terms increase in NHS funding of £8bn in
the next five years.
Mr Osborne said this would fund the NHS reforms suggested in NHS England’s five-year plan, which includes new models for providing general practice.
However,
the BMA said that this ‘simplistic’ age limit would risk ‘distorting
clinical priorities’, while the Labour Party said that these pledges
were unfunded.
In the article in the Telegraph, Mr Hunt said the UK must ‘face up’ to the ‘demographic timebomb’.
He
added: ‘We will introduce during the course of the next Parliament
same-day GP appointments for all over-75s. We need in the NHS is to be
better at looking after people while they are at home so that they don’t
need expensive hospital care in A&E departments.
‘We want to
give everyone the confidence that they can get in to see a GP quickly.
We can do that because of the extra investment.’
Mr Osborne said that the Conservatives backed NHS England’s plans.
But,
he added: ‘There’s no point having a plan without the funding to
deliver it, so today we commit to deliver what the NHS needs. The Five
Year Forward View sets out a projected gap between costs and resources
of up to £30bn by the year 2020-21. As the plan says, the majority of
this gap, £22bn, can be made up through efficiency and reform, as well
as improvements in public health and prevention that will keep people
healthier for longer.
‘The NHS will do its part, and we will do
ours. So I can confirm that in the Conservative manifesto next week we
will commit to a minimum real-terms increase in NHS funding of £8bn in
the next five years.
However, the GPC criticised plans for same-day access for the over 75s.
Dr
Chaand Nagpaul, chair of the GPC, said: ‘Putting in place a simplistic
age limit for services runs the risk of distorting clinical priorities.
It cannot be right for a 76 year old with a minor ailment to get
preferential care at the expense of a 70 year old with a more serious
condition.
‘There is also a question mark over whether GPs have
the ability to deliver same day appointments when many GP practices are
under intense pressure from rising workload and falling resources, and
without the capacity to meet current demands.’
Responding to Mr
Osborne’s statement, Chris Leslie, Labour’s shadow chief secretary to
the Treasury, said: ‘George Osborne’s extreme plan to double the pace of
spending cuts next year means he cannot credibly claim to protect the
NHS. Other countries which have tried to make cuts on this scale have
ended up cutting their health services. That’s why he wasn’t able to
announce any extra NHS funding in his Budget last month
‘And the
Tories have £10 billion of unfunded tax promises which they also can’t
say how they will pay for and are ahead of the NHS in the queue.’
The NHS Five Year Forward View, published in October,
set out a number of efficiency savings scenarios based on its plans for
reforming services, especially primary, urgent and elderly care, by
2020. It said that if nothing was done the funding gap would be £30bn
while a 2-3% efficiency saving per year would mean there was still £8bn
annually missing from the budget.
But many have argued this is a
very aggressive savings target, as since 2004-05 savings have been
estimated at 1.5% per year and hospitals, the urgent care system and GP practices are already squeezed financially with no real terms pay
increases for several years.
Mr Osborne announced a £2bn ‘down payment’ on the Five Year Forward View reforms in the Autumn Statement, while last week health secrerary Jeremy Hunt said the Tories would pay ‘whatever’ is needed for the NHS.'
No comments:
Post a Comment