Thursday 29 March 2018

CQC Remains Concerned Over the Safety of Online Healthcare Services

The CQC has published a report reflecting on its findings from 55 inspections of online primary care services, such as those that provide GP consultations and prescriptions through independent websites and apps.

The report concludes that the quality of online primary care services has improved over the last 12 months but that further action from providers and the wider system is needed to ensure they are as safe as general practice in physical premises.

Key Findings

  • 97% of the providers were meeting the regulations around being ‘caring’. An example of where this has worked well was a company that provided sexual health services online, which offered partner notification services (whereby with the person’s consent, it could confidentially trace their sexual contacts to flag to those who may have been at risk and encourage them to be tested).
  • 90% of the providers were meeting the regulations around being ‘responsive’ to people’s needs. Examples the CQC identified included providers that made ‘type talk’ available for patients with hearing loss and one provider responding to a significant uptake in the number of Chinese students requesting services and producing an information leaflet in Mandarin.
  • The CQC has found that online consultations have the potential to improve access and convenience for some patients, such as those with physical impairments for whom attending face-to-face appointments could be difficult, those with sensory impairments, and those who live in rural areas and have poor transport links.
  • As of 28 February 2018, 43% of the providers the CQC inspected were found not to be providing ‘safe’ care in accordance to the relevant regulations. This is an improvement from 86% not fully meeting these regulations on their first inspections. 
Safety is where CQC found the greatest concerns but also, where the CQC has seen the greatest improvement with some providers even addressing issues on the day of inspection itself; such as, by deciding to no longer prescribe certain medicines or by introducing new policies.  Specific concerns the CQC had included: 
  • Inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics, including lowered thresholds for antibiotic prescribing as a physical examination was not possible, 
  • prescribing high volumes of opioid-based medicines without talking to the patient’s registered GP,
  • unsatisfactory approaches to safeguarding children and those who may not have the mental capacity to understand or consent to a consultation,
  • not collecting patient information or sharing information with a patient’s NHS GP, who should have an accurate and up to date record of their previous and current treatments and health problems,
  • inappropriate prescribing of medicines for long-term conditions, including failures to monitor the volume of asthma inhalers being prescribed to individuals when their condition should be regularly checked.
Professor Steve Field, Chief Inspector of General Practice at the Care Quality Commission, said “New methods of service delivery that increase access to care and give patients more control over how and when they see a GP have huge potential not only for patients but for the wider health system."

“However, while innovation should be encouraged, it must never come at the expense of quality. As with all health care services, patient safety must be at the heart of all decisions around what kind of care is offered and how it is delivered."

“This is why we have taken action where we have seen risks to patients - and why we have been encouraged to see many providers take note of our findings and make swift improvements to how they operate."

“This way of delivering primary care has an important place in the future of health provision – but it are still evolving. We must all work together – providers by using our inspection findings to learn and improve, and oversight bodies by working together and continuing to have a positive dialogue with providers – to ensure that this model fulfils its promise of accessible, responsive care while ensuring that the care delivered is always safe and high quality.”

No comments: